- PII
- 10.31857/S0201708325040072-1
- DOI
- 10.31857/S0201708325040072
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume / Issue number 4 (132)
- Pages
- 77-87
- Abstract
- The article is devoted to the specifics of bilateral cooperation between the US and the EU in the sphere of strategic competition with China. Along with the growth of China's economic and military-political capabilities, a global confrontation between Washington and Beijing has emerged in the system of international relations. American only ally comparable in scale is the European Union, and bilateral cooperation in this emerging confrontation has become a priority of the ambitious diplomatic agenda. An important factor is European integration and the trend towards Common Security and Defense Policy. At the same time, cooperation between the US and the EU in the context of strategic rivalry with China has a number of unique features. First, the US and the EU continue intensive mutually beneficial economic trade and investment cooperation with China. The economic dimension is much more important in the context of current strategic competition, compared to the Soviet-American confrontation during the Cold War. Cooperation between the US and the EU is aimed at containing the competitiveness of the Chinese economy. Second, in the military-political dimension, NATO remains the most important actor. In addition, an important trend is the involvement of regional partners in the Asia-Pacific region in the orbit of the US and the EU. Third, an important aspect is technological rivalry aimed at limiting the military-technological potential of the PRC.
- Keywords
- США ЕС Китай трансатлантическое сотрудничество стратегическое соперничество безопасность европейская интеграция внешняя политика ЕС
- Date of publication
- 01.04.2025
- Year of publication
- 2025
- Number of purchasers
- 0
- Views
- 6
References
- 1. Бабынина Л.О. (2022) Постбрекзит: от интеграции к конфронтации. Научно-аналитический вестник ИЕ РАН. № 6. С. 24–31. DOI: 10.15211/vestnikieran62022431
- 2. Громыко А.А. (2024) Мир полицентризма: роль ценностей в конкуренции ведущих держав. Полис. Политические исследования. № 6. С. 7–21. DOI 10.17976/jpps/2024.06.02.
- 3. Потемкина О.Ю. (2021) Новая стратегия Союза безопасности ЕС. Европейская аналитика 2020. Под общ. ред. К.Н. Гусева. ИЕ РАН, Москва; Нестор-История, Санкт-Петербург. С. 10–18.
- 4. Степанов А.С. (2022) Политика США в Юго-Восточной Азии: от Б. Обамы до Дж. Байдена. США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. № 8. С. 90–101. DOI 10.31857/S2686673022080077
- 5. Biba S. (2024) The European Union's Place in United States–China Strategic Competition: How Role Dynamics Drive Brussels Towards Washington. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. Vol. 63. No. 1. P. 71–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13605
- 6. Gordon Ph., Shapiro J. (2019) How Trump Killed the Atlantic Alliance and How the Next President Can Restore It. Foreign Affairs. 26.02. URL: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/201902-26/how-trump-killed-atlantic-alliance (дата обращения: 30.04.2025).
- 7. Kaveshnikov N., Lupalisova A. (2024) The Transformation of China's Image in European Expert Discourse. Sovremennaya Evropa. No. 5(126). P. 60–73. DOI: 10.31857/S020170832405005X. EDN: ROZANJ.
- 8. Kinninmont J., Werenfels I. (2024) Regaining NATO’s Southern Neighbours. SWP Comment 2024/C 25. 28.06. 6 p. DOI: 10.18449/2024C25
- 9. Nováky N. (2022). The Coordinated Maritime Presences concept and the EU’s naval ambitions in the Indo-Pacific. European View. Vol. 21(1). P. 56–65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/17816858221089871
- 10. Shambaugh D. (2008) The New Strategic Triangle: U.S. and European Reactions to China’s Rise. Global Powers in the 21st Century: Strategies and Relations. Ed. by A.T.J. Lennon, A. Kozlowski. The MIT Press. P. 151–172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262622189.003.0010
