Библиография

1. 1. Ahmed, S., Assaf, R., Rahman, M.R., & Tabassum, F. (2023). Is geopolitical risk interconnected? Evidence from Russian-Ukraine crisis. The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00306
2. 2. Brzezinski, Z. (2019). Bàn cờ lớn [The Grand Chessboard]. Hanoi: Omega Plus Publishing House.
3. 3. D’Anieri, P. (2012). Ukrainian foreign policy from independence to inertia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 45(3), pp. 447‒456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2012.06.008
4. 4. Dodds, K., & Taylor, Z., & Akbari, A., & Broto, V.C., & Detterbeck, K., & Inverardi-Ferri, C., & Woon, C.Y. (2023). Territory-Politics-Governance, 11(8), pp. 1519‒1536. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2023.2256119
5. 5. Geneuss, J., & Jeberger, F. (2022). Journal of International Criminal Justice, 20(4), pp. 783‒786. https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac055
6. 6. Hong, D.M., & Hiep, L.H. (2018). Thuật ngữ Quan hệ Quốc tế [International Relations Terminology]. Hanoi: National Political Truth Publishing House.
7. 7. Kaplan, R.B. (2018). Sự minh định của địa lý [The Revenge of Geography]. Hanoi: Writers Association Publishing House.
8. 8. Kiet, L.H. (2024). Mục tiêu chiến lược của Hoa Kỳ thông qua xung đột Nga-Ukraine [America’s strategic goals through the Russia-Ukraine conflict]. Vietnam Journal of World Economics and Politics, 4(16), pp. 53‒66.
9. 9. Khudoley, K.K. (2023). Европа в кризисном мире: нарастающие проблемы без однозначных решений [Europe in the Crisis World: Pressing Issues, Unobvious Solutions]. Contemporary Europe - Sovremennaya Evropa, 6, pp. 204‒216. DOI: 10.31857/S0201708323060177
10. 10. Kiet, L.H., & Tuyen, N.V. (2023). Vị trí địa chính trị Việt Nam đối với Hoa Kỳ trong chiến lược ngăn chặn tham vọng bá quyền của Trung Quốc [Vietnam’s geopolitical position with the United States in preventing China’s hegemonic ambitions]. Danang Journal of Science and Technology, 21(8.1), pp. 63‒69. https://jst- ud.vn/jst-ud/article/view/8630/5950
11. 11. Marshall, T. (2020). Tù nhân địa lý [Prisoners of Geography]. Hanoi: Writers Association Publishing House.
12. 12. Mearsheimer, J.J., & Walt, S.M. (2016). The Case for Offshore Balancing: A Superior US Grand Strategy. Foreign Affairs, 19(4), pp. 70‒83. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43946934
13. 13. Vakarchuk, D.O., & Ivoninskaia, A.A. (2024). Влияние российско-украинского кризиса на позиции немецких партий по проблеме энергетического перехода [Impact of the Russian-Ukrainian Crisis on the Approaches of German Parties towards Energy Transition]. Contemporary Europe - Sovremennaya Evropa, 2, pp. 57‒69. DOI: 10.31857/S0201708324020050
14. 14. Raik, K., Blockmans, S., Osypchuk, A., & Suslov, A. (2024). EU Policy towards Ukraine: Entering Geopolitical Competition over European Order. The International Spectator, 59(1), pp. 39‒58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2023.2296576
15. 15. Shyrokykh, K. (2018). The Evolution of the Foreign Policy of Ukraine: External Actors and Domestic Factors. Europe - Asia Studies, 70(5), pp. 832‒850. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1479734
16. 16. Tuan, N.A. (2022). Chính sách đối ngoại của Ukraine từ năm 1991 đến nay [Ukraine’s foreign policy from 1991 to present]. Hanoi: Truth National Political Publishing House.