RAS Global AffairsСовременная Европа Contemporary Europe

  • ISSN (Print) 0201-7083
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5995

Insurance of Foreign Investments from Political Risks In EU Countries: Imperatives of International Development

PII
S30345995S0201708325020068-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034599525020068
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 2 (130)
Pages
65-78
Abstract
Thе article examines the specifics of the EU countries’ practices of insuring foreign investment from political risks through the lens of international development agenda. It consecutively identifies the institutional aspects of relevant activities, objectives and conditions of foreign investment insurance or guarantees, scale and geographical scope of coverage, as well as the trends that have emerged over the last years. The research demonstrates that almost all EU countries insure outward investments ignoring the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Most export credit agencies (ECAs) pursue commercial goals and hardly coordinate their activities with international development agencies and development finance institutions, cover exclusively the investments from the companies connected to the home country and do not maintain preferential conditions for the projects in the least developed countries. Against this background only Germany stands out – in its institutional separation of export credits and investment guarantees, in the participation of the Federal Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) in the decision-making; in linking its activities with the SDGs, and in improving conditions of coverage for the climate-friendly projects. The sheer volume of the coverage in the EU countries – except for Germany and Italy – is very limited, whereas the actual geographical distribution of the investment guarantees and insurance unveils the prevalence of the projects in the higher income countries. Over the next 5 years other EU members might seek to “developmentalise” political risk guarantees and insurance – through “greening” of covered investments. However, the trend towards securitisation of such instruments will likely have a greater impact.
Keywords
прямые иностранные инвестиции политические риски страхование инвестиционные гарантии поддержка экспорта содействие международному развитию Цели устойчивого развития страны ЕС Германия Украина
Date of publication
01.02.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
9

References

  1. 1. Белоусова Т.А. (2015) Современная практика страхования экспортных кредитов в странах ЕС. Финансовый журнал. № 3(25). С. 91–97.
  2. 2. Попова О.П. (2019) Содействие международному развитию как инструмент внешней политики и внешнеэкономической деятельности ФРГ. Дисс. … канд. полит. наук. Москва. 227 c.
  3. 3. Барановский В.Г., Квашнин Ю.Д., Тоганова Н.В. (ред.) (2018) Содействие международному развитию как инструмент внешней политики: зарубежный опыт. ИМЭМО РАН, Москва. 248 c. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20542/978-5-9535-0548-2
  4. 4. Урумов Т.Р. (2018) Государственная поддержка экспортной деятельности малого и среднего бизнеса: мировая практика и выводы для России. Дисс. … канд. экон. наук. Москва. 147 c.
  5. 5. Dimopoulos A. (2012) Foreign Investment Insurance and EU Law. TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2012–028. 18.07. 26 p. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2112053
  6. 6. Felbermayr G., Janeba E. (2024) Improving Supply Security: Guidelines and Policy Proposals. Intereconomics. Vol. 59. Issue 3. P. 146–153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2024-0031
  7. 7. Glitsch J., Godart O.N., Görg H., Mösle S., Steglich F. (2020) Lagging Behind? German Foreign Direct Investment in Africa. KCG Policy Paper No. 5. Kiel Centre for Globalisation, Kiel, Germany. 24 p. URL: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/219039 (дата обращения: 09.08.2024).
  8. 8. Gordon K. (2008) Investment Guarantees and Political Risk Insurance: Institutions, Incentives and Development. OECD Investment Policy Perspectives, OECD Publishing, Paris, France. P. 91–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/ipp-2008-5-en
  9. 9. Jaeger M. (2023) A More Strategic Approach to Foreign Direct Investment Policy. DGAP Policy Brief No. 1. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Auswärtige Politik, Berlin, Germany. 10 p. URL: https://dgap.org/system/files/article_pdfs/dgap-policy%20brief-Vorlage-en.pdf (дата обращени: 09.08.2024).
  10. 10. Keukeleire S., Raube K. (2013) The Security-Development Nexus and Securitization in the EU’s Policies Towards Developing Countries. Cambridge Review of International Affairs. Vol. 26. Issue 3. P. 556–572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2013.822851
  11. 11. Krajewski M. (2012) Investment Guarantees and International Obligations to Reduce Poverty: A Human Rights Perspective. SSRN. 08.01. 17 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1981747
  12. 12. Schlögl L., Raza W., Pfaffenbichler D. (2024) Aligning European Export Credit Agencies with EU Policy Goals. PE 702.590 – April 2024. European Parliament. 33 p. DOI: 10.2861/148804
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library