Библиография

1. 1. Растворцева С.Н., Панина Е.В., Кочешков М.А. (2023) Налоговые инструменты стимулирования инноваций в странах ЕС. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. Т. 67. № 3. С. 20–32. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-3-20-32
2. 2. Ahvenniemi H., Huovila A., Pinto-Seppä I., Airaksinen M. (2017) What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities? Cities. No. 60. P. 234–245. DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009
3. 3. Anttiroiko A.V. (2016) City-as-a-platform: The rise of participatory innovation platforms in Finnish cities. Sustainability. No. 8(9). DOI: 10.3390/su8090922
4. 4. Anttiroiko A.V., Valkama P., Bailey S.J. (2014) Smart cities in the new service economy: building platforms for smart services. AI & Soc. No. 29. P. 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0464-0
5. 5. Bashir M., Yousaf A., Verma R. (2016) Disruptive business model innovation: How a tech firm is changing the traditional taxi service industry. Indian Journal of Marketing. No. 46. P. 49–59.
6. 6. Bellone C., Naselli F., Andreassi F. (2021) New Governance Path through Digital Platforms and the Old Urban Planning Process in Italy. Sustainability. No. 13(12). P. 6911. DOI: 10.3390/su13126911
7. 7. Cohen B. (2006) Urbanization in developing countries: Current trends, future projections, and key challenges for sustainability. Technology in society. No. 28(1–2). P. 63–80.
8. 8. Derksen G., Michura P., Ruecker S. (2015) Stories and Conversations in the Smart City. Smart Cities as Democratic Ecologies. Ed. by D. Araya. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK. P. 64–86.
9. 9. Eckhoff D., Wagner I. (2018) Privacy in the Smart City–Applications, Technologies, Challenges, and Solutions. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. No. 20. P. 489–516. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2748998
10. 10. Edelman B.G., Luca M. (2014) Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb.com. Harvard Business School Working Paper. No. 14-054. 21 p. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2377353
11. 11. Han W., Wang X., Ahsen M., Wattal S. (2022) The Societal Impact of Sharing Economy Platform Self-Regulations – An Empirical Investigation. Information Systems Research. No. 33(4). P. 1303–1323. DOI: 10.1287/isre.2021.1044
12. 12. Haveri A. (2006) Complexity in local government change: Limits to rational reforming. Public Management Review. No. 8(1). P. 31–46.
13. 13. Janowski T., Estevez E., Baguma R. (2018) Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizenadministration relationships in the digital age. Government Information Quarterly. No. 35(4). P. 1–16.
14. 14. Johnston J. (2015) Public Administration: Organizational Aspects. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Ed. by J.D. Wright. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands. P. 521‒525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.73057-1
15. 15. Kleinhans R., Falco E., Babelon I. (2022) Conditions for networked co-production through digital participatory platforms in urban planning. European Planning Studies. No. 30(4). P. 769– 788. DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2021.1998387
16. 16. Mohammadi N., Taylor J.E. (2017) Smart city digital twins. 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). P. 1–5. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1109/SSCI.2017.8285439
17. 17. Mora L., Bolici R. (2017) How to become a smart city: Learning from Amsterdam. Smart and Sustainable Planning for Cities and Regions: Results of SSPCR. Ed. by A. Bisello, D. Vettorato, R. Stephens, P. Elisei. Springer, Berlin, Germany. P. 251–266.
18. 18. Niaros V. (2016) Introducing a taxonomy of the “smart city”: Towards a commons-oriented approach? tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society. No. 14(1). P. 51–61.
19. 19. Sengers F., Berkhout F., Wieczorek A.J., Raven R. (2016) Experimenting in the city: Unpacking notions of experimentation for sustainability. The experimental city. Ed. by J. Evans, A. Karvonen, R. Raven. Routledge, London, UK. P. 15–31.
20. 20. Shin M., Shin J., Ghili S., Kim J. (2023) The Impact of the Gig Economy on Product Quality Through the Labor Market: Evidence from Ridesharing and Restaurant Quality. Management Science. No. 69(5). P. 1–19. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2022.4481
21. 21. Spil T.A., Effing R., Kwast J. (2017) Smart city participation: Dream or Reality? A comparison of participatory strategies from Hamburg, Berlin & Enschede. Digital Nations – Smart Cities, Innovation, and Sustainability. 16th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2017, Delhi, India, November 21–23, 2017, Proceedings. Ed. by A.K. Kar A.K., P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan, M.P. Gupta, Y.K. Dwivedi, M. Mäntymäki, M. Janssen, A. Simintiras, S. Al-Sharhan. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. P. 122–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68557-1_12
22. 22. Vallas S., Schor J. (2020) What Do Platforms Do? Understanding the Gig Economy. Annual Review of Sociology. No. 46. P. 273–294. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-soc-121919-054857
23. 23. Viitanen J., Kingston R. (2014) Smart Cities and Green Growth: Outsourcing Democratic and Environmental Resilience to the Global Technology Sector. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. Vol 46. Issue 4. P. 803–819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/a46242
24. 24. Woods O., Bunnell T., Kong L. (2024) Island platforms and the hyper-terrestrialisation of Singapore’s smart city-state. Territory, Politics, Governance. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2024.2317211