RAS Global AffairsСовременная Европа Contemporary Europe

  • ISSN (Print) 0201-7083
  • ISSN (Online) 3034-5995

Mario Draghi’s Report Through the Lens of Critical Geopolitics

PII
S30345995S0201708325020159-1
DOI
10.7868/S3034599525020159
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume / Issue number 2 (130)
Pages
175-183
Abstract
Mario Draghi's September 2024 report on European competitiveness is the basis for the political economy direction that the European Union will follow in the next five years. The article analyses the report through a critical geopolitics lens, employing discourse analysis of practical geopolitics to decipher its embedded meanings within broader EU political debates. The analysis reveals three key discursive categories: foundational narratives, missed in the report narratives and new meanings. Fundamental narratives include existential threat to the EU, economic dependence, and market regulation as a geoeconomic necessity. Absent, but actively discussed by EU politicians, are narratives of EU naivety, open strategic autonomy, and EU actorness in the world system. The absence of these categories demonstrates a shift to the active phase of building unified patterns of foreign economic relations. New meanings encompass a combination of twin green and digital transition with competitiveness and strengthening of the defence industry, collective effectiveness, and the EU's foreign economic policy. Despite the fact that the EU foreign economic relations follow the logics of selection of trading partners and security concerns, the report demonstrates a demand for greater communitarianisation and prioritisation of EU-level objectives over national interests. These findings reveal the strengthening of geopolitics, which continues to play a major role in reshaping of Europe political economy.
Keywords
Европейский союз политическая экономия промышленная политика торговая политика геополитика критическая геополитика
Date of publication
01.02.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
5

References

  1. 1. Буторина О.В. (2024) Доклад Драги прерывает «обед молчания ЕС». Аналитические записки ИЕ РАН. № 21. С. 49–50. DOI: 10.15211/analytics32120244351
  2. 2. Громыко Ал.А. (2020) Метаморфозы политического неолиберализма. Современная Европа. № 2. С. 6–19. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15211/soveurope220200619
  3. 3. Павлова Е., Романова Т. (2017) Нормативная сила: теория и современная практика России и ЕС. Полис. № 1. C. 162‒176. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2017.01.14
  4. 4. Романова Т.А. (2023) Эволюция концепции «цифровой суверенитет» в Евросоюзе: константы и дихотомии. Современная Европа. № 4. С. 62–76. DOI: 10.31857/S0201708323040022
  5. 5. Campbell D. (1993) Politics without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, USA. 128 p.
  6. 6. Di Carlo D., Schmitz L. (2023) Europe first? The rise of EU industrial policy promoting and protecting the single market. Journal of European Public Policy. No. 30(10). P. 2063–2096. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2202684
  7. 7. Franza L., Van Der Linde C. (2017) Geopolitics and the Foreign Policy Dimension of EU Energy Security. Energy Union: Europe's New Liberal Mercantilism? Ed. by S. Andersen, A. Goldthau, N. Sitter. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK. P. 85–98.
  8. 8. Gehrke T. (2022) EU Open Strategic Autonomy and the Trappings of Geoeconomics. European Foreign Affairs Review. No. 27. Special Issue. P. 61–78.
  9. 9. Herranz-Surrallés A., Damro Ch., Eckert S. The Geoeconomic Turn of the Single European Market? Conceptual Challenges and Empirical Trends. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. No. 62 (4) P. 919–937. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13591
  10. 10. Juncos A., Vanhoonacker S. (2024) The Ideational Power of Strategic Autonomy in EU Security and External Economic Policies. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. No. 62 (4). P. 955–972. DOI: 10.1111/jcms.13597
  11. 11. Kuus M. (2010) Critical Geopolitics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. Ed. by N. Sandal. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.137
  12. 12. McNamara K. (2024) Transforming Europe? The EU's industrial policy and geopolitical turn. Journal of European Public Policy. No. 31. P. 2371–2396. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2023.2230247
  13. 13. Ó Tuathail G., Agnew J. (1992) Geopolitics and Discourse: Practical Geopolitical Reasoning in American Foreign Policy. Political Geography. No. 11 (2). P. 190–204.
  14. 14. Sinn H.W. (2014) The Euro Trap: On Bursting Bubbles, Budgets, and Beliefs. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 416 p.
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library